-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
Update Codeowners, Issues, and Project automation #609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: bmorelli25 <[email protected]>
georgewallace
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left my comments
georgewallace
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would like @shainaraskas and @szabosteve to review the changes to the groups. I think I got it right.
Co-authored-by: George Wallace <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: shainaraskas <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: George Wallace <[email protected]>
florent-leborgne
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Experience docs is missing from a few places
Co-authored-by: florent-leborgne <[email protected]>
shainaraskas
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couple of mild quibbles
| # Legacy serverless docs | ||
| /serverless/ @elastic/admin-docs | ||
| /serverless/serverless-changelog.asciidoc @elastic/docs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can just delete these files, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
idk maybe, probably?
georgewallace
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good with this once we add @shainaraskas feedback
colleenmcginnis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a couple little suggestions.
Co-authored-by: shainaraskas <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: shainaraskas <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <[email protected]>
|
Thank you for all of your helpful suggestions 👥 |
What
How issues/triaging will work
If a writer opens an issue in their teams area, they are expected to remove the
needs-teamlabel and apply the appropriate docs team labels. For all other instances of issues opened, the assigned "on call" writer will triage issues by adding them to their teams product boards and fixing easy issues.